Stand Your Ground Part 3


by Pastor Mark Downey

Scripture Reading: Numbers 25:5-13

The question that faces Christendom in general and Identity Christians in particular is: what are you going to do when faced with racial violence?  Because of the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman incident, one pastor recently declared “The race war has begun.”  But, as I’ve said before, the race war of black on White crime has murdered, raped or robbed over a million White victims in the last 30 years.  What I would like to hear declared is that a Holy War has begun and it can begin within our movement, because whether rightly or wrongly portrayed, the Christian Identity movement has been labeled militant and radical.  I would prefer the moniker of ‘zealous’ for the Word of Truth.  A zealous Christian is not someone who is prone to violence, but is no one’s doormat, and discriminates who walks through his door, allowing mud to be tracked into the house.  The current trend of home invasions would be met with the zealous use of a shotgun.  But, it is not just our home that is under attack, but the whole house of Israel.

Everything in the Bible is there for a reason and the story of Phinehas is no fluke or anomaly.  It’s a model for the zealous believer in the God of Israel.  Now there are some detractors who would de-fang the principle of “Don’t Tread on Me,” and consider a modern day Phinehas nothing more than a hoodlum.  There’s even some postulation that the seedline of Phinehas ended during the time of Eli, and therefore the everlasting covenant that God made with him was nullified.  And genealogically that may or may not be true, but that does not nullify a Christian man from being zealous in the spirit of Phinehas.  But, that is a very narrow view i.e. that “his seed” means his descendants only, because seed can also mean his racial posterity, which we all have in common. 

In ‘Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible’ we read, “Now though Phinehas in course was to have the priesthood at his father's death, yet it is here promised him on account of his zeal, both to assure him that he should survive his father, and that nothing should befall him that should render him incapable of the priesthood; and moreover, that he should have a seed in whom it should be continued; there was indeed an interruption of it in his line for a little while, on some account or other, it being translated into the family of Eli, a son of Ithamar; but then it was restored again in the time of Solomon to the family of Phinehas, where it continued unto the captivity, and even to the times of Herod, and so of the Messiah: in this also Phinehas was a type of Christ, the covenant made with him not only being from everlasting and to everlasting, a covenant that cannot be broken, and will never be removed; but the priesthood founded on it is so too, being established by the oath of God, who swore to him, "Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek": Christ's priesthood is an unchangeable one, and does not pass from one to another; His sacrifice has a perpetual virtue and efficacy in it to take away sin, and He ever lives to make intercession for His people (Hebrews 7:21), because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel; by executing judgment upon the delinquents, as Christ has made atonement for the sins of His people by satisfying law and justice: and, besides what has been observed, it may be remarked, that there is an agreement between Phinehas and Christ in his very name; Phinehas signifies either "the face of him that spares", that is, of God, that spares; Christ is the face of God, the express image of His person, even of Him, who, though He spared not Christ Himself, yet He spares His people for Christ's sake; or else "he shall look that spares", or "and spare"; that is, God, who looks upon the person, righteousness, blood, and sacrifice of His Son, and spares His people.”

What this tells me is that the priesthoods of Aaron and Levi were made without an oath, but the priesthoods of Phinehas and Melchizedek were both forever or “everlasting.”  It therefore makes sense, that at the time of Christ, a transition was in the works for something better in which the spirit of Phinehas was absorbed into the order of Melchizedek.  The same supernatural adjustment was made covenantally with the New Covenant.  Any one of us can stand our ground as Christians and execute judgment upon the delinquents, keeping our access to God open and, “So the plague was stayed from the children of Israel.”  It doesn’t necessarily have to be with a spear or violence, unless there is absolutely no other remedy.  And that’s the storm that we are approaching: a clash between two systems of authority.  The authority of Romans 13 is indeed violent in that “Rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil” (v.3).  It doesn’t say anything about democratic elections, but rather “ministers of God” that are “ordained of God”, “a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.”  That must terrify the Rockefellers and Rothschild’s.  I believe we are at an appointed time when those who rule over us are absolutely corrupt and void of authority.  Obama certainly has no right to rule over White people.  And the race traitors, who made it so, have no right to live in a land married to God, a Beulah land.  “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before Me” Luke 19:27.  The God of love said that.  Now an emasculated evangelist would say the emulation of Phinehas is a sin, but what is he going to say to Jesus when he’s given the command to slay?  “Well, Jesus… I’m not one of those terrorists or vigilantes.” 

A race war can only be countered by a holy war.  Standing your ground is not just the self defense of an individual, but securing the life of a nation-race.  And thus, there is “A time to kill” (Eccl. 3:3) in lieu of being killed.  A holy war is White Christian men standing their ground to stop the plague of divine cause and effect.  The effect of a cowardly tolerant people of all religions and races is their own destruction for not being zealous for their own God. 

It’s all right there in Deut. 28 where we read about the blessings and the curses.  “But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee” (v.15); “The Lord will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods, and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed” (v.27) some Christians in the health field believe this is talking about cancer and it can’t be healed with any of the AMA methods of cut, burn and drug;  “And thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness, and thou shalt not prosper in thy ways, and thou shalt be only oppressed and spoiled evermore, and no man shall save thee” (v.29) hey, how about them bailouts; “Thy sons and daughters shall be given to another people… a nation which thou knowest not shall eat up the fruit of thy land” (v. 32, 33) amnesty for illegal aliens.  In other words, we’re sick, we’re broke and we’re mongrelized.  This is the cause and effect of disobedience.  It sounds pretty bleak and dismal, but there is a remedy.  “And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe and to do all his commandments which I command thee this day, that the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God” Deut. 28:1-2.   

Richard Hoskins said this in his book (previously cited), “Only the fool ignores the Phineas Priest of God!… In Denver, an anti-Christian radio announcer stepped from his Volkswagen and was greeted with a hail of gunfire. In North Carolina, men entered a homosexual porno- parlor, shot the occupants and burned the parlor down on top of them.  In the Midwest, interracial couples jogging together fell one after another before the carefully spaced shots of a distant sniper.  In Seattle, a bomb exploded in a porno movie theatre.  In Washington State a Brinks car is held up and money taken to finance further acts against the establishment.  In Louisiana, Vietnamese fishing boats are set aflame.  In Chicago, a pedestrian draws a pistol and shoots down two assailants.  In Washington D.C., a White prostitute and her Black pimp are found shot to death.  It makes little difference whether you agree or disagree with the Phineas Priesthood. It is important that you know that it exists, is active, and in the near future may become a central fact in your life."  Wouldn’t it be ironic that those who chastise a godly priesthood as “hoods” were surrounded by those seeking justice for Trayvon (negros in ‘hoodies’ from the hood) and suddenly rescued by the spirit of Phinehas. 

To suggest that the priesthood of Phinehas is dead is to have a death wish upon your own people (and I don’t mean the Charles Bronson types).  Every culture has their protectors and defenders, otherwise they will perish.  We all know Hosea 4:6, “My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge” and that vital information is withheld by the pulpits from wolves who keep the sheep passive and ready for the slaughter.  The last thing they want is a militant church with zealous members who are intolerant of other religions and aliens waging a race war.  Knowing our identity is the first step in knowing our responsibilities.  “To whom much is given, much is required” Luke 12:48.

In case you haven’t noticed, there has been a protracted psychological warfare going on for years with a ‘hate Whitey’ campaign in the media, education and even in the churches.  Lower class Whites are encouraged to celebrate stupidity i.e. ‘you know you’re a redneck if…’, while the upper class are suckered into the god of materialism i.e. ‘greed is good.’  It’s not exactly breaking news, but most White people have heard that they will be a minority in their own nation in just a few decades.  The cause is a preoccupation with ‘self’ at every social level.  Didn’t Jesus say, “If any man wants to follow Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me.”  We can’t bear another man’s cross; only he can crucify the old man.  But, we can “Bear ye one another's burdens” (Gal. 6:2).  In fact, we can go even further than that for, “There is no greater love than this: that a person would lay down his life for the sake of his friends” John 15:13.  There’s the spirit of Phinehas, daring to put your life on the line regardless of the peril.  God expects heroism and provides a safety net for the faithful, “Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it” Luke 17:33.  As great as the dangers may be, your priority in life is not your personal safety, but rather your God given racial consciousness.  It’s your spirit, not your flesh.  We are the only race where eternal salvation is spoken of.  The sinners of every age go on their merry way, secure in their evil ways and remember not their latter end; unless they’re a Charles Darwin or Ted Bundy making a last minute confession and even then only God knows the intent of their heart.  But wherever the wicked are, who are marked for eternal ruin, shall be found by the judgments of God. 

Man-made laws can try as they will to suppress what is within the White man and makes him ‘vessels of honor’ in the eyes of God, but these laws will only succeed with those who have forsaken their birthright.  A new national campaign is seeking to repeal the ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws, which they have sarcastically renamed ‘Shoot First’ laws, spearheaded by New York City mayor, jew Michael Bloomberg, who has made disarmament a top priority in New York.  Evidently, he and snivel rights leader Al Sharpton are not satisfied with gun control in their own state and want to stick their nose into the state rights of over 20 states who have legislation making it legal for an individual to use deadly force in public ‘to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony’ like the violence perpetrated by Trayvon Martin.  The governor of Florida has begun a task force to review public safety laws and make recommendations.  Officials hope the task force will complete its work by the time of the state’s next legislative session.  A member of the U.S. Civil rights Commission, Michael Yaki (a pro-homosexual oriental advisor to Nancy Pelosi; does that tell you anything?), said last week (4-16-12) that he will ask the agency to investigate such laws.  A bunch of unelected non-White bureaucrats are going to shoot down ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws.

In just the last three weeks, since Part 2 of ‘Stand Your Ground’ (4/15/12), there have been more black on White hate crimes, that the mainstream media refuses to cover, but are clearly exposed on the internet with headlines like these:  “Hundreds of far-left thugs celebrate May Day with violence in Seattle” or “Black school official orders police to cease arrests at violent Alabama school” or “Pearl, MS, White police officer killed by a convicted black child molester” or “Illegal alien kills baby, injures seven others” or “Black mob brutally beat White couple in Norfolk, VA” or  “Deltona, FL, home attacked by black mob” or “Gangbangers ruin Detroit carnival” or “Three blacks arrested for gruesome hate crime murder in Hickman County, KY” or  “Speakers urge violence and murder at Occupy rally in DC.”  But, perhaps one of the most disturbing developments was a news story Joe sent me. It reported, “For the second time in a matter of a few days, blacks decided to beat up a White male for ‘justice for Trayvon Martin.’  In Chicago, two black teens beat up a White male, because they were mad about theTrayvon Martin case. Now in Alabama, a gang of 20 black males beat up a White male named Matthew Owens with chairs, pipes, paint cans, and brass knuckles.  As the attackers walked away, leaving Owen bleeding on the ground, one of them said, “Now that’s justice for Trayvon.”  As usual, aside from a few local news pages, there is pure silence from the media. 

Obama said that if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin. But, it’s more likely if Obama had a son, it would look like the thugs in Chicago or Alabama.  After all, Obama is nothing less than a communist thug himself and role model/poster boy for violent negros, the sons of perdition.  Did you hear his recent announcement to launch ‘African Americans for Obama’?... speaking of blacks, he said, “Who gave up their lives to help build a country that lived up to its founding principles… their unwavering determination changed this country… making it possible for somebody like me to be here today… this is another moment where we’ve got to decide what kind of country we want to be… Say you’re ready to keep making history.”  Tell me this isn’t in-your-face racism.  What do you think would happen if Romney or some other White republican candidate for President produced a YouTube video for all White people to unite together to elect someone of their own race?  The media would go ballistic! 

Many of our folks in Christian Identity have heard the story of Blood River where not one (of about 500) White man, woman or child (or even their livestock) was killed in a battle against 10,000+ Zulus in 1838 South Africa.  But, how many of our dearly beloved kindred have ever heard the historical account of every single White person, who inhabited a particular country, were murdered en masse by savage negros?  I’m going to tell you that story today and I hope it makes a lasting impression on your soul, because if it happened once and it can happen again.  Do you remember when the OJ Simpson decision came down, the day the jury found him not guilty?  I remember seeing blacks going ape and cheering wildly as if OJ made a touchdown.  Whereas White people’s reaction was that of stunned disbelief.  I believe we can draw an analogy between African-Americans voting for Obama who would likewise cheer wildly over the story of an entire White population being decimated.  History is repeating itself, where the herd mentality of black racism is change you can count on for reverse discrimination and wanton violence. 

One of the most popular books and author at the turn of the 20th century was Lothrop Stoddard who wrote his Ph.D. thesis on Haiti and later published it as ‘The French Revolution in San Domingo.’  That country is now known as the Dominican Republic, which is the eastern half of the Caribbean island of Haiti, one of the most God forsaken places on earth.  Stoddard called the black uprising “The first shock between the ideals of White supremacy and racial equality.”  Columbus discovered the island in1492, but Spain did not stay there very long, although their presence was important.  They killed most of the Indians and left for more promising expeditions in Peru and Mexico, setting their livestock free.  Europeans ignored the island for about a century, but settlers who came in the 1600s found an island filled with cattle and pigs, and empty of hostile natives.  The new arrivals to the western part were mostly buccaneers who preyed on Spanish ships and hunted the abundant wild cattle (the word “buccaneer” comes from the French boucaner, “to barbecue beef”). As the Spanish consolidated their hold to the east, the French slowly took control of the west, which became French San Domingo.

At the time of the French Revolution in 1789, French San Domingo was at its most prosperous with over a thousand plantations.  The colony was leading exporter of coffee, sugar, cocoa and cotton.  However, its affluence was based on a fragile racial dynamic of 40,000 Whites ruling 500,000 black slaves; the majority African-born. There was also an intermediate class of 27,000 mulattos who had come about because of an initial scarcity of White women, and which would play an important role in the future of the colony.  Over time, a caste system developed, based on skin pigment, which was so convoluted that it was no mere demographic of Whites and blacks, but at least 6 different racial forces, where alliances and back-stabbings would meander back and forth in vicious conflicts. 

Even after the arrival of French women, it was common for wealthy Whites to keep mulatto mistresses. Still, the color line was well observed when it came to marriage. The few White men who married mulattos were shunned by White society and stripped of their rights with the French government’s approval.  Officially classified as free people of color, mulattos could own land, businesses, and even slaves. They despised the slaves but resented the Whites, to whom they were subordinate. Mulattos could not vote or hold office. They were segregated in theaters, shops and churches, and even the wealthiest mulatto was the social inferior of the poorest White.  Whites of all classes as well as the authorities in France considered the color line natural and necessary. Outnumbered 13-to-1 by blacks and mulattos, Whites had good reason to stay united in the face of occasional uprisings on rural plantations in which slaves slaughtered all the Whites they could catch. Moreover, the French blamed the relative failure of Spanish and Portuguese colonies on miscegenation, and did not want to make the same mistake. Whites would maintain the color line at all costs, but the bitterness of the mixed-race class would soon find a sympathetic ear.

Along comes the French Revolution in 1789 and the trepidation over revolutionary ideas entering the colony would make it possible for the people of color to take power and slaughter the Whites.  So the French White population took refuge in the Spanish San Domingo area, which they regarded as a reserve for the monarchy and Catholicism. From this position they planned to prevent the triumph of subversive factions.  They knew that the financiers of the revolution had its main sources of income in the slave trade and the sugar market, both linked to slave labor in the French colony.  And of course it is a well known fact that jews were the primary entrepreneurs facilitating African slaves to the New World and the players behind a Jesuit façade in the Illuminati.  To complicate matters worse, France and Spain had gone to war with each other.  Behind the scenes, Spain supplied arms and ammunition to the black generals and encouraged them in their rebellion, and thus violating their neutrality back in Europe. 

It was a real mess with the French refugees counting on the help of the Spanish royalist governor, needing help against the black rebels, who had already gone out of control and had started killing the White inhabitants of the French colony indiscriminately.  At that point, the governor refused to help them and told them that although he had backed the black rebels who were starting to go wrong, he had to consult with the Spanish Crown and added that if he sent troops, he would weaken the defense of his own colony that would be an easy prey for the former slaves if they decided to cross the frontier. The French exploited the latter argument precisely to persuade him to help them, telling the Dominican governor that if the French and the Spanish did not join their forces to confront the black insurgents, the whole island would soon be a black possession. 

The Dominican authorities knew that there were many chances that the black rebels would turn against the same White people that had tried to use them for their own benefit. In that case, the Dominican authorities would send more troops to the border to avoid a black invasion of Santo Domingo, and would also protect the French White monarchists that crossed the frontier. After that, they would wait until the French and the former slaves killed each other, so they would have the perfect excuse to send troops to Saint-Domingue not only to restore order, but also to restore the Spanish sovereignty over that territory, which had been a Spanish colony until the French took it in the peace Treaty of Ryswick in 1697. 

Negotiations between the Spanish Dominicans and black generals, undertaken by a mulatto priest, offered land and freedom, which they agreed to in return for fighting the French.  Initially, the White officers of the Dominican army disapproved the enrollment of former slaves that had risen up and killed their masters.  The French also tried the ploy to offer universal emancipation, but were unsuccessful.  At the same time there were internal conflicts and tensions between the black auxiliaries.  The caste system was anything but blind. 

Spain and France put an end to their confrontation in Europe in 1795 with a peace treaty implying San Domingo’s cession to France.  What really agitated the black slaves more than anything else was the false rumor perpetrated by the Spaniards that the French king had granted the slaves a three day holiday per week.  And to put salt on the wound, after they had created the black revolutionaries, the Spanish Crown planned to get rid of those troops as soon as they achieved their strategic goals. 

Along with the French Revolution came abolitionists of the same ilk found in America.  The White colonists in San Domingo began to wonder how far these zealots would take their slogan “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.”  Almost from the beginning, the National Assembly in Paris pushed for full citizenship rights for mulattos. Mulattos were emboldened and Whites distressed when the Jacobins announced in 1792 they were sending a civil commission, supported by 6,000 troops, to San Domingo to enforce the rights of mulattos. When the black slaves heard the news they went into open revolt in the hope that they, too, would get freedom. Whites in San Domingo were therefore under siege from slaves, mulattos and their own government. One White who managed to return to France predicted the outcome: “You may announce unreservedly that it is all over with San Domingo. One of three things will follow: the Whites will exterminate the whole mulatto caste; the mulattos will destroy the Whites; or the negroes will profit by these dissensions to annihilate both the Whites and the mulattos. But in any case, San Domingo should be erased from the maps of France.”

The commission arrived and went to work, forcing Whites to recognize full citizenship rights for mulattos. The result was chaos and race war. By 1793, most Whites had either been killed or fled to France or the United States. About 10,000 settled in the U.S. where they were received sympathetically.  Many soldiers who had accompanied the French commission also left with them rather than help destroy their own people.  With the defeat of the Whites, mulattos expected to rule in their place, exploiting the labor of black slaves, but the blacks, led by black General Toussaint L’Ouverture and supported by the French government, rose up against the mulattos, who met the same fate as the Whites.  L’Ouverture and his troops slaughtered them by the thousands.  By 1801, the former slave was supreme ruler of San Domingo. He strengthened ties with the British, who helped keep his troops well armed in exchange for supplies from the naturally rich island. In 1800 he invited Whites back to the island, assuring them they would be well treated. A few thousand returned. He gave many back their plantations and ordered most blacks to work for the Whites and for the state. The powerful military made short work of anyone who opposed this neo-slavery.  His nephew, a black general named Moyse, led a revolt against these ‘pro-White’ policies and he put down the insurrection and executed his nephew.

Why didn’t the French take a greater role in suppressing the violence after more conservative elements regained control in Paris?  In fact, Napoleon wanted to send troops but was stretched thin with campaigns in India and Egypt and war with Britain.  In 1802, after peace with Britain, Napoleon did manage to send a force of 12,000 under Charles Leclerc with orders to take San Domingo, restore it to French rule, and arrest L’Ouverture.  Napoleon did not at first plan to reestablish slavery but he wanted to restore French sovereignty over a White-run colony. The outnumbered French defeated the blacks, forcing L’Ouverture to surrender in the spring of 1802.  What appeared to be a success soon turned to failure.  That summer a great many French soldiers, as well as thousands of civilians, caught yellow fever and died. L’Ouverture began to plot an uprising against the weakened French, but blacks loyal to Leclerc managed to lure him within the French lines and capture him. Leclerc packed L’Ouverture off to jail in France where he caught tuberculosis and died. Nevertheless, as disease continued to ravage the White troops, Leclerc began to depend increasingly on the doubtful loyalty of black generals and their followers. To Leclerc’s dismay, Napoleon rescinded the ban on the slave trade and urged the re-establishment of slavery in the colonies. The black soldiers were furious, and many went into insurrection. Napoleon reestablished restrictions on mulattos as well-something completely impossible to enforce in San Domingo, which broke down the strong antipathy between blacks and mulattos and united them against the French. 

The British blockaded the island and supported the blacks and mulattos in what was now open race war against the French. In November 1803 the French surrendered and sailed away, leaving San Domingo in the hands of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, a former slave who had been one of L’Ouverture’s generals. It is this combination of yellow fever and support from the British that accounts for the Afrocentric claim that a black army defeated Napoleon.  Dessalines, who crowned himself Emperor, wanted to break all ties with France. One symbolic step was to change the name of the colony to Haiti. He guaranteed safety to Whites who remained, and even encouraged more to come, but this was a ruse. In early 1805, he ordered their extermination. A French officer who escaped described the carnage: “The murder of the Whites in detail began at Port-au-Prince in the first days of January, 1805, but on the 17th and 18th of March they were finished off en masse. All, without exception, have been massacred, down to the very women and children ... A young mulatto named Fifi Pariset ravaged the town like a madman searching the houses to kill the little children. Many of the men and women were hewn down by sappers, who hacked off their arms and smashed in their chests. Some were stabbed with daggers, others mutilated, others ‘passed on the bayonet,’ others disemboweled with knives or sabers, still others stuck like pigs [the murderers were instructed to use silent weapons, rather than gunfire, so that the killing could be done more quietly, and avoid warning intended victims by the sound of gunshots and thereby giving them the opportunity to escape]. At the beginning a great number were drowned [800 French soldiers left behind were executed by drowning]. The same general massacre has taken place all over the colony, and as I write you these lines I believe there are not twenty Whites still alive-and these not for long.”   With this final slaughter, French San Domingo vanished from history and the black nation of Haiti arrived. 

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was an ethnic cleansing which was carried out on the remaining White population in the entire territory of Haiti from February to April and resulted in the death of 3,000 to 5,000 of our kindred of all ages and gender.  Haiti has made one genuinely unique gift to world culture: voodoo. Apparently, the mythic voodoo ceremony signaled the beginning of San Domingo’s slave revolution.  Eighty percent of the population is Catholic, 20 percent are Protestants, and all 100 percent believe in voodoo. Up until the 1950s, Catholics tried to stamp out voodoo, but have now adopted some of its rituals.  I’d like to give credit to James P. Lubinskas with his article on ‘The Revolution in Haiti’ found at the American Renaissance archives, some of which was quoted. 

Well, what have we learned?  Why didn’t they stand their ground?  What was the difference between the Dominican Whites and the South African Boers?  What was the difference in their motives for being on the land?  What was their purpose in life?  What was their relationship with God?  Which of these two societies is America headed?  Do racial realities matter in the world today?     

I always try to close on a positive note even though things seem dark and foreboding.  It’s been recently reported, the Department of Homeland Security, an agency that says its main purpose now is to thwart "homegrown terrorism," has awarded a contract to ammunition manufacturer ATK for acquiring 450 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow point ammo.   One of the nation’s largest suppliers of dehydrated food has cut loose 99% of their dealers and distributors and it’s not because of the economy. It’s because this particular industry leader can no longer supply their regular distribution channels. Why not? Because they’re using every bit of manufacturing capacity they have to fulfill massive new government contracts.  The approximate tab for 420 million meals comes to about a billion dollars, that’s tax dollars.  Factor-in the media foaming at the mouth for race riots and we have something like San Domingo. 

But wait, there’s more!  Do you know who and where the largest army is in the world?  There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state of Wisconsin.  Allow me to restate that number: over the last several months, Wisconsin's hunters became the eighth largest army in the world.  More men under arms than in Iran.  More than France and Germany combined.  These men deployed to the woods in a single American state, Wisconsin, to hunt with firearms, and no one was killed.  That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted the woods of Pennsylvania and Michigan's 700,000 hunters, all of whom have now returned home safely.  Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia and it literally establishes the fact that the hunters of those four states alone would  comprise the largest army in the world.  And then add in the total number of hunters in the other 46 states.  It's millions more.  The point?  America will be safe forever from foreign invasion with that kind of home-grown firepower.  Hunting... it's not just a way to fill the freezer.  It's a matter of national security.  That’s why all enemies, foreign and domestic, want to see us disarmed.  In that regard, let us turn to the Bible, which is an owner’s manual for the White race and read some hope for the situation.  "Five of you shall chase a hundred and one hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight, and your enemies shall fall by the sword" (Lev. 26:8).  With that thought, we will stand our ground just fine.