The Name Game

by Pastor Mark Downey

For some time I have been asking my fellow Christians the question "how well do you know God?" Today, I would like to ask the question "how well do you know the NAME of God?". In this message, Lord willing, I'm going to contest the 'sacred name' issue. Is it wrong to call God . . . God? or our Savior Jesus Christ? Some say it's all wrong.

Before I go any further, I want us to remember a very important fact, and that is the antichrist jews hate the name of Jesus Christ above and beyond all other names. Their animosity is so woven into Judaism that their subversions have become the fabric of Judeo-Christianity, an oxymoron created by the rabbis. Their gambit into so-called 'sacred names' has become a game of fraud. I came to understand the truth that the White race is Israel some 25 years ago. By the early 1980s, I started hearing this so called sacred name business, and even then it rubbed me the wrong way because it sounded jewish. But like so many other impressionable Israelites, I too, started using these names that we were told were the pronunciations of ancient Israel. But there was this nagging childlike disbelief that questioned its usage.

For example, I wondered how do you take the name of the Lord thy God in vain with these newly discovered supposedly Hebrew words. And are the old cussing and profanity against God and Jesus Christ irrelevant if we are to apply the sacred names?

We'll get into some of the easy controversy that even children can figure out a little later. Even in the 1980s, I wanted to know the source of this weird teaching. I say weird because all my life God and Jesus Christ were the standard, and I found out at that time that most such spurious advocates of the sacred name school emanated from a guy named Jacob Meyers and the Assemblies of Yahweh. There was a picture of him and his followers in his newsletter and they had big black beards and black hats, looking like rabbis straight out of Brooklyn, NY. That rubbed me the wrong way. It wasn't until the 1990s that the sacred name infection had become full blown in Christian Identity circles. Even Aryan Nations was touting the Yahweh and Yeshua nonsense. I say nonsense because it was all based on unproven assumptions that people are supposed to take for granted to be the truth. I hope by the time I've ended this message, my fellow Christians will think twice about using these alleged Hebrew names, especially in their prayers.

By the way, do you really think that our Creator is going to condemn us if we don't use these yiddish sounding names? The jews are so clever at putting a guilt trip on our sheeple.

How well do you know God? "Our righteousness should exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees" Mt. 5:20. We should know Him, not just by a couple convoluted theological designations, but by all of the names, titles and identities that He has given us in His Word for our understanding. No wonder Christian Identity is so hated. We identify God. And don't you think He wants us to know who He is? Who is He? The enemies of God don't want you to know. They want to pass Him off with one or two pious appellations.

Well, I have a treat for you today. I have over 100 names of God that He has given to Himself so that we might get to know Him well. Forget whether His sacred name begins with a y or a j. Here's the entire alphabet from A to Z and I dare anyone to suggest that they are not sacred.

A He is the Author and finisher of our faith, the Alpha and the omega, Advocate.
B Bread of life, the Bright morning star, the Beginning and the end, the Beloved of the father, the Bridegroom of the church and the Bishop of our soul.
C Creator of the heavens and the earth, the Chief shepherd, the Cornerstone of the church, and the Captain of our salvation.
D Door of our salvation, Desire of all nations, the Dayspring from on high, and the Diadem of beauty.
E Ensign of all nations, the Exceeding great reward and the Eternal life of our soul.
F Fountain of life, the Firstborn of many brethren and the Faithful and true witness.
G the Good shepherd, our Great high priest, the Governor of the nations and the Guardian of our soul.
H the Head over all principalities, the Horn of salvation, the Holy Son of God, the Head of the church and the Healer of our soul.
I the Image of the Invisible God, the I am of the ages and our Immanuel.
J Judge of all the earth, the Just One and the Justifier of our faith.
K King of kings, King of glory, King eternal, Key of knowledge and the Kind shepherd.
L the Lord of all lords, the Lamb of God, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Lily of the valley, the Light of the world.
M Mediator of the new covenant, Man of sorrows, Messiah of Israel, the Merciful savior and the Maker of our soul.
N He is the Name above every name, the Nazarene and the New and living way to God our Father.
O the Only begotten of the Father, our Only mediator and the Offering for our soul.
P Prince of peace, the Priest of the most high God, the Pearl of great price and the Physician of our soul.
Q He is the Quest of our soul, the Quiet place of rest, the way to the Quickening spirit.
R the Resurrection and the life, the Rock of our salvation, the Rose of Sharon, our Redeemer, the Refuge of my soul and the Root of David.
S Son of God, the Shepherd, the Savior and the Sun of righteousness.
T He is the Tower of our salvation, the Tree of life, the True bread from heaven, the True light of the world, the Truth and the Teacher of my soul.
U He is the Undefiled Son of God, the Uncorruptible God and the Upholder of my soul.
V the Vine of all the branches, the Very present help in time of need, the Veil that was rent and the Vision of my soul.
W He is the Way, the Wisdom of God, our Wonderful counselor, the Word made flesh, the Well beloved Son,
X He is X bearer for our sin.
Y He is Yesterday, today and tomorrow and the Yoke made easy.
Z the Zealous fulfiller of all righteousness.

From the Book, "In Defense of the Name Jesus Christ" by Pastor Dan Gayman, pp 7-8. "All credit for the above description of Jesus Christ goes to the Institute in Basic Life Principles, Box 1, Oak Brook, IL 60522."

Here we get a portrait of the spirit and character of God, rather than a sterile religious interpretation. Why am I making a big deal about what we should call the deity of our faith? Because I recently gave a sermon on Christian unity and as a body of Christ, we should not fail to meet the scriptural demand that we speak the same thing and be united in the same mind (I Cor 1:10). Romans 15:5 commits us to mind the same things being of one accord. What's interesting about this unity is the first part of I Cor 1:10 where it states, "I beseech you brothers in the name of ... who?" Is it Jesus Christ or Yeshua? What difference does it make? The difference is that both can't be right. One of these names is a sham.

Any student of the Bible can go to Strong's Concordance and look up the word 'name' and discover that it means more than a secular designation of what a person identifies themselves as. Biblically, 'name' in the New Testament (#3686) means authority or character in over 100 passages. There are lots of characters in Christendom who don't have Christian character, because of misinterpretations. The word 'name' should have been translated 'authority'. Any honest scholar can discern this issue. Again, it goes back to the question, 'how well do you know God?' Is the authority Christian or jewish?

The tampering of God's Word, perpetrated in the name of rabbinical authority cannot be allowed to destroy the true identity of God. On one hand, we expose the antichrist jew as the destroyers of mankind and then, on the other hand, employ their half baked subterfuges. We stand little chance of retaining converts if we collectively can't get a simple thing like God's name/authority right.

Have you wondered why Christian Identity is plagued by the sacred name issue and not judeo Christianity? Could it be that the churches are already corrupt enough? The monkey wrench that has been thrown into the Christian Identity message is that the New Testament was written in Hebrew or Aramaic and that it originally said Yahshua or Yehoshua and was later translated into Greek, which is a blatant lie. The second deception is that somehow Joshua of the Old Testament is in the etymology of the New Testament Jesus. It's been difficult for sacred namers to dispute the fact that the Septuagint (the Old Testament written in Greek) was the only scripture that Christ and His Apostles read and quoted from. There are no ancient Hebrew manuscripts of the Old Testament. So the best the jews can do is say that the Hebrew sacred names were retained in the Greek Septuagint.

There were vain attempts by jews to supplant and pervert the Old Testament with a corrupt Hebrew into Greek during the 2nd century A.D. None of them ever succeeded due to the love and respect early Christians held for the Septuagint. What is left of that jewish conspiracy is mostly fragmentary, however, the Septuagint has survived in its entirety. The Sacred Namers claim that these Hebrew names are inserted in the all-Greek text of the Septuagint, but there are no manuscripts in existence of the Septuagint with Hebrew names for God.

The hook, line and sinker that I bit into that so many of our kinsmen have likewise been conned into believing, is the lie that the name Jesus is equivalent to the name Joshua. And the fraud has been arbitrarily promoted through Strong's Concordance. The connection cannot be proven. At the time of Christ, people reading the Septuagint could not read Hebrew. This was the purpose of the translation. If the translators (who were not jews) wanted to retain the sacred names in the Septuagint, they would have transliterated the names into Greek letters. This was the practice with all other Hebrew names in the Old Testament, and thus this is what they would have done IF Yahweh or Elohim were names and not just the generic designations for master, lord or god. There's no proof that the Saviour's name was Yashua or Yehoshua or any other kind of shua.

I will not pretend to be an expert on the pronunciations of the Greek 'Iesous' or any of the homemade permutations of Hebrew. The problem is that there are too many people pretending to be experts. The problems of trying to pronounce the unknown leads to the dangers of legalisms and being no different than the Pharisees. These schools of dogmatism are the first in line to eternally damn someone who cannot or will not pronounce a word like they do. However, the current that flows throughout the sacred name debate fosters confusion and there are no winners. Why the confusion? Because nobody knows for sure, yet they plow ahead on pure conjecture. There's no guarantee of certain words being spoken correctly the way they were originally.

The academic study of ancient languages is complex and imprecise because of the myriad ways in which sound is replicated from one language to another, from one generation to the next. The gaps in time and cultures sometimes create a vacuum filled with arbitrary filler, just like the pious rabbis who made up things as they went along. The obsession then becomes the sound of words or phonetics, rather than the meaning of words. One becomes guilty by acoustical association and is shown the sign to hell from sloppy and ridiculous scholarship, such as taking the name of Jesus and erroneously associating it with the pagan god Zeus i.e. Gee-Zeus.

God is not the author of this confusion. If there are a dozen varieties of a sacred name, then which ones are going to burn in the fiery pits - knowing that a lot of them modify their pronouncements more than once? I guess we could say the sacred name losers are in the same boat as Christians who use the name of Jesus. Some Christians realize what is important is the person behind the name. Others, without so much as a pretense of brotherhood are ready, willing and able to disfellowship over these trivial pursuits. The Messiah's name means salvation no matter what language or dialect it is rendered in. Therefore, forcing mandatory pronunciations is not only futile, it is stupid. Do you really think that God is so derelict in not knowing the hearts and minds of those who call out for Him?

"Jesus rejoiced… and said, I thank thee, O Father… that thou hast concealed these facts from intellectual philosophers, and have revealed them to children… and no man knoweth who the Son is but the Father, and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal Him" Luke 10:21-22. "I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gave Me, out of the world" John 17:6. "And I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it: that the love wherewith thou hast loved Me may be in them and I in them" John 17:26. From the above three passages, God has revealed Himself to me through His Son. I therefore resign myself from teaching anybody anything about ancient pronunciations. I have no qualms, compunctions or reservations about using the name Jesus.

The influence of Jacob Meyers, a self-confessed jew, for some mysterious reason, made inroads in the Christian Identity community with his brand of sacredness. Beginning in 1966 in Bethel, Pennsylvania, Meyers had the financial backing to eventually publish his own special Bible eliminating the name of Jesus Christ. Perhaps it was due to the fact that these Bibles were being given away free, that they became so popular. Such projects, no doubt, have jewish strings attached with the projected vision of causing strife and divisions within the radical right. Anybody can go to his website and see pictures of his church-synagogue adorned with the occult 6 pointed star of Molech, menorahs, and interracial congregation and a statement of beliefs which proudly proclaims, "The Assemblies of Yahweh teaches that salvation is freely given to every member of the human race. We affirm that the Scriptures teach that every person is welcome in the family of Yahweh regarding race." Of course the Scriptures teach no such thing.

We know that judeo-churchianity, the mainstream establishment doesn't suffer from the sacred name cancer, probably because the apostate church is comatose and brain dead from other jewish fables and they've already crossed the threshold of unpardonable sin.

Another proactive 'Yahshua' advocacy group is the 'Jews for Jesus', an utterly absurd oxymoron. Some purport that the word jew is a religious label. If this is the case, then why not 'Hindus for Jesus' or 'Voodoos for Jesus'? The word jew is in fact religious and racial. It is impossible for racial jews to be for Jesus, because they have a genetic destiny for prophetic annihilation as mentioned in the Book of Obadiah. They are the descendents of Esau-Edom. They are the tares of Matthew 13. 'Jews for Jesus' are for the perpetuation of the Big Lie that jews are Israel. They are for the American tax supported Israelie welfare state in Palestine. They are for the antichrist Babylonian Talmud, as they do no repent of rabbinical teachings of judaism. They are for the unchristian celebrations of Hanukkah, Rosh Hashanah, Bar Mitzvahs, and a polluted Passover.

The Bible represents these deceivers as 'the traditions of man, which makes God's Word of non effect'. These pharisees live to bypass the Word of God by reinventing Bible law in order that they may justify their wickedness. These 'holocaust' crybabies are masters of deceit. They conspire to get us on the wrong side of God. They know what causes the wrath and indignation of the Lord. Put on your thinking caps and ask yourself if calling God ... Yahweh, might be angering the Lord, if that is an artificial title created by the children of darkness. Would you let somebody call you jackass indefinitely??

II Chronicles 19:2 says, "Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? Therefore is wrath upon thee from the Lord." Thus when we look at some of the things Jacob Meyer and Identity puppets have to say, their method for proof is found wanting. Let's remember I Thess. 5:21 "Prove all things, hold fast to that which is good". This stupid name game is not good because even its advocates can't decide which vowels go in between the tetragramaton. Is it Yahweh or Yahveh or Yahvah or Yehovah or Yoyodoodle? Is it Yashua or Yeshua or Yahoshua or Yo-shua (ebonics)? It's none of the above. It's the 100 plus names of God that you read earlier that are clearly in the Bible.

The Jews for Jesus insist on Y'shua as the jewish way to say Jesus, but I don't have enough spit in my mouth to speak yiddish. Did you ever notice the similarity between the words rabbi and rabid and how they are always foaming at the mouth about being persecuted? It is well known in jewish circles that Y'shua means "let his name be blotted out". Here's what the Bible says about the jew in Jeremiah 24:9-10: "And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them. And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they be consumed from off the land."

Here's a good question. Can the name of true Israel's Messiah be found in any name, in both Old and New Testaments? In Isaiah 7:14 and Matthew 1:23, His name was to be called Emmanuel, which is interpreted as "God with us". There's a slight difference in spelling, but isn't it interesting that the Hebrew word Immanuel made it into the Greek New Testament? It is clearly much more of a given than the tortured yiddish hybrid. So why don't we say Emmanuel as a far superior proof, in our normal conversations? What happened to poor little Yashua, if the Hebrew name for Jesus was so important? Why didn't it appear in the Greek New Testament like Emmanuel?

Isaiah 9:6 declares "For unto us a child is born and His name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace". The point here is that our Kinsman Redeemer is called by several names, not just one sacred ineffable name. Who wants to be guilty of verse 16 "for the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed"? We must honor our God with the clear names He has given us in His Word to address Him, not out of the dark dirty basement of some jew sorcerer. And the sacred name game is sorcery. There's all kinds of devilish psychology going on here. We don't need to play head games with the name game. Let's face it, jews can lie with impunity and they're not going to be arrested or put in jail for falsifying theological issues.

Pentecostals push the premise that we are transformed by the renewing of our hysterical emotions. Identity believes we are transformed by the renewing of our mind as the Bible teaches. The Pentecostals entering Identity that we have interacted with have been real big on pushing the Sacred Name fiasco just like Jacob Meyer. People like this have no business to say they are being about our Father's business, when really they're just in business for themselves. This kind of thing simply caters to false piety and those caught up in false piety render themselves totally worthless to the warfare of the spirit of truth. It's kind of funny how those who sow discord among brethren are the first to manipulate emotions and resort to name calling. More name games.

We have come to the point in time in our racial nation, that if a man or group of men speaks up for the truth, we are castigated as causing division. But defending the gospel of Jesus Christ is not an act of disunity, but is in truth, an act of unity.

The reason why I want to pursue this Sacred Name business, to pursue and chase it out of our White churches, indeed, out of our national temple and psyche is because of the harm and contamination it causes upon the body of Christ. It's just like a cancer. It entered our Movement some 20 years ago, gaining momentum with the subtlety of the serpent that slithered into the garden and messed with Eve's head. Hardly any of our ministerial leaders have taken the responsibility to examine this linguistic phenomenon of transforming the name of our deity. It's been a quiet and passive acceptance, without looking at the source of this important change. Do you think it may be the same type of sorcerers of words who crafted the word "gay" which once meant happiness and merriment, but now means a despicable perversion? The same sorcerers are also trying to redefine the word Identity, as it applies to Christian Identity, with the implication that we are all homicidal maniacs.

Some of our people in the Movement have gotten scared and have changed the perfect description of our theology to less troublesome appellations like Anglo-Israel or Christian Reform. Could it be that that the name 'Identity' is too successful, and therefore these other names are less offensive to the antichrist jews; just like their hatred of the name Jesus Christ and, therefore, His name has to be changed to an unproven yiddish Yahshua. Hey, if the shua fits, by all means wear it.

The thing is, thank God, I'm an Israelite, not a jew. Jesus Christ came only for the lost sheeple of the House of Israel. Israel is not synonymous with jews. Jesus said, "My sheep hear my voice" and "I know them and they follow me" (John 10:27). Do jews hear the words of Jesus and follow Him? Everybody knows they do not. They reject Jesus Christ with a passion and their book of religious opinions and rationalizations for sin, the Talmud, gives very specific orders not from God, but from rabbis to destroy Christianity by any means. The enemies of God and the White race know better than ourselves how to accomplish this goal. They get us to disobey and thus incur the wrath of the Lord; just like getting us to pronounce these silly pretend fictions that they have the audacity to pass off as sacred names, and are, in fact, nothing more than a jewish concoction.

Let me give you a synopsis of the fraud that has been exposed so far in this thesis.

  1. The Sacred Name business emanates from jewish sources.
  2. It has no historical or etymological foundation.
  3. Yiddish (a polluted jewish language) has presumptuously impersonated the ancient Hebrew language for a counterfeit pronunciation of the alleged sacred names.
  4. The real issue is not in God's name, but in God's authority which begs the question, is our authority Christian or jewish?
  5. Christian Identity seems to be targeted for this semantic manipulation rather than the mainstream establishment of judeo churchianity (and I speculated that this is because their cup of iniquity is already full).
  6. The purveyors of the sacred name scam can only support their theory with lies . . . such as:
    • The NewTestament was written in Hebrew or Aramaic.
    • The Old Testament scriptures that Jesus used were Hebrew.
    • Both of the above are lies as they were both written in Greek.
  7. Here are some indisputable facts
    • The word Yeshua could not have been translated into Greek if it was Greek in the first place and was the name Jesus.
    • The word Yahweh (a title for master or lord) was not a name and was not transliterated from Old Testament to New Testament as other Hebrew names such as Emmanuel; if the translators of the Old Testament Greek Septuagint (who were not jews) wanted to retain any sacred name, they would have done so, transliterating the tetragramaton into Greek letters, the YHWH was properly translated as Lord.
    • If we were to take a time machine ride back to the time of Christ, we would hear His name being pronounced as Jesus. There is absolutely no proof that His name was Yahshua. The Sacred Namers can't agree on which vowels go in between the tetragramaton and so this division of rabbinical opinion creeps into our Movement with the lame forgiveness of cognitive dissonance . . . 'oh well, we'll just look the other way and pretend that problem doesn't exist.'
'let his name be blotted out'

Let me remind you that when Jesus Christ is referred to in jewish literature and spelled Y'shua, it means let his name be blotted out. Now I ask you, are you an accomplice to the contempt against our Lord and Saviour by aiding and abetting in the repetition and promulgation of this antichrist jewish conspiracy? They conspire to get us on the wrong side of God. These modern day pharisees live to bypass the word of God by reinventing Bible law in order that they may be justified in their sins. If you don't think God gets angry with His Israel people, when we mouth the same artificial profanity created by the children of darkness whom God declares 'He hath indignation forever' (Malachi 1:4), then by all means yell Yahweh from the rooftops like the Pentecostal judas goats.

Remember how God will accommodate the desires of your heart? If it's lies you want, God will give you the biggest delusion you can imagine. You want to be a missionary to Eskimos? You might be spending the next 20 years in an igloo. Hosea 13:15 tells us "though Ephraim be fruitful among his brothers, an east wind shall come, the wind of the Lord shall come up from the wilderness . . ." and it goes on to say that his well will run dry and his treasures will be spoiled for his disobedience; for being tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine by the deceitful trickery of jews and their willing puppets, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive (Eph. 4:14).

There are some judeo churches that accept the jewish practice of debt and usury within the confines of their 501c3 status. Do you think this is well pleasing to God? Many churches are involved in the promotion of racial integration. This always leads to miscegenation and God always condemns racemixing. Why? So that those bastards will not enter the congregation. (Deut. 23:2) Standing on hallowed ground is important to God. He doesn't want the worship and adoration of His presence, being among us, to be defiled. Now that begs the question, is the use of these not-so-sacred sacred names defilement? Does it defile and spoil the purity of our sanctuary if we incorporate the terms of the antichrists? Yiddish is not of our Aryan culture! Why would we want to increase lies and the accompanying desolation as Ephraim fed and followed after the east wind?

The desires of the heart are idolatry if it is not in accord with God's word. The sacred name hoax is not based on the truth of scriptures, it comes from the same style of word manipulation found in the Talmud. Why on earth would anyone practice idolotry, especially White Christians, knowing that the spiritual mechanism at work here is self inflicted misery? Are our people masochistic or worse yet, suicidal? We know that the modern idols of the new millennium are not just images in stone or little wood carving fetishes, but can be the idols of our heart, the words of our mouth, the thoughts of our mind. It is the abra kadabra magical Cabalistic Yahweh/Yeshua incantation of the rabbis.

One of the things God hates in Proverbs 6:18 is a lying tongue and a heart that deviseth wicked imaginations and that's just what this heinous plan to spread the jewish sacred name game among Aryan Israelites is. It is the work of a deluded witness whose intentions, I'm sure, are good. But what is the road to hell paved with? It's paved with the asphalt of holier-than-thou wordcraft and mantras of false piety. This kind of person is completely worthless to our spiritual and physical warfare for the survival of our race and the cause of Christ.

Let's consider a few more thoughts from Isaiah 41:15 which says "Behold, I will make thee a new sharp threshing instrument having teeth: thou shalt thresh the mountains, and beat them small, and shall make the hills as chaff." God is reassuring the White race that He will help. I hope that I've been cutting to ribbons the sacred name game with the teeth of truth.

Verse 16 of Isaiah 41 says "Thou shalt fan them and the wind shall carry them away, and the whirlwind shall scatter them and thou shalt rejoice in the Lord and shalt glory in the Holy One of Israel." In other words we need to spread the truth to the lost sheep of Identity; that our Christianity can and will prosper without jewish influence and intrusions. What happens to an intruder breaking into your house? Isaiah 57 really adds thought to this discussion by castigating ancestors of the Sacred Namers starting in verse 3, "But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer (mongrelizers) and the whore. He's talking to racemixers and race traitors." Verses 4-5: "Against whom do ye sport yourselves . . . inflaming yourselves with idols?" Who are you playing this name game with and causing so much grief?" Verse 11: "And of whom hast thou been afraid or feared that thou has lied, and has not remembered me, nor laid it to thy heart? Have I not held my peace even of old, and thou fearest me not?" God doesn't immediately judge those who lie without fear of Him." Verse 12: "I will declare thy righteousness and thy works; for they shall not profit thee." God is going to expose their worthlessness. Verse 13: "When thou criest, let thy companies deliver thee; but the wind shall carry them all away; vanity shall take them: but he that putteth his trust in me shall possess the land, and shall inherit my holy mountain." To paraphrase, 'when you jewish cry babies cry persecution, let your travelling carnival of smoke and mirrors save you. God will eradicate them. Their own worthless conceit will blow them away.' Verse 14: "Take up the stumbling block out of the way of my people." This is the sacred name game that causes our people to stumble." Verse 15: "For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy." The Hebrew word for holy as found in Strongs is #6918 and is spelled qadosh and is pronounced kaw-doshe. Do we start calling God . . . kaw-doshe??? NO! WE DON'T!

I don't have a copy of Rotherham's 'Sacred Name Bible' in my library, nor do I wish to have one. Just because they have their own Bible does not legitimize their claim. All they've done is taken the KJV and replaced the nouns of God with a mistranslated proper noun. Grammatically this is a misnomer. The enormity of this literary adulteration is on par with the holocaust hoax of WWII. The idea jews have always promoted is that if they are going to lie, it must be on a gigantic scale. These Sacred Name Bibles are handed out like hotcakes, for free. Somebody, somewhere is footing the bill, and that is the price the purveyor of propaganda has to pay. If the campaign is successful, the dividends far outweigh the initial investment. Just look at how the holocaust translates into billions of dollars in foreign aid and war reparations

So what is the payoff for promoting the sacred name game? Well, it weakens our Aryan culture when the vulgar Khazar Talmudist can say 'vee speak da same language'. Why do our people want to sound yiddish in their speech, and how many racialists are we turning off that would otherwise turn to Christian Identity?

There's an organization called the Torah Faith. This same organization is known for promoting the Noahide Laws. They are trying to steal people from our Movement. It's a mutation of British Israelism, saying the 10 tribes of Israel are the Anglo-Saxons and that the jews are the tribe of Judah and Levi. But here's the kicker: they say it is judaism, not Christianity that is our common religion. Believe it or not, there are actually some White lemmings who are gullible enough to fall for this tripe. It is even more evident by the cancer that has latched onto Christian Identity called Universalism, the unbiblical teaching that Christ came for all the races and that the doctrine of salvation is not exclusively meant for Israel. And guess what? Most of these Universalists parrot the line 'Yahweh/Yeshua want a cracker?'

The point that should be obvious to any objective believer is the flagrant disregard for the absolute integrity of God's Word and the arbitrary misrepresentation of scripture; that's a long winded way of saying one word . . . sin. The un-sacred name is a transgression of the Law/Word and causes our people to fall into other jew inspired sins. What prohibition of God am I talking about? I'm talking about the last thing the Bible has to tell us in Revelation 22:18-19: "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

Now there may some smart alec who says, 'that's only the book of Revelation' as if the rest of the Bible can be messed with. Let's look at Deut. 4:2, where it reads "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it that ye may keep the commandment of the LORD your God which I command you." Is that clear or does it take a jewish rabbi to tell us it means something else? Deut. 12:32 reads "What thing so ever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it." Are we clear? I think I've shown conclusively that this is not only a game of replacement language in how we communicate the message of the Old and New Testaments, but also replacement theology.

The word 'name' in the KJV New Testament is found 150 times and only once does it mean name. The other 149 times, it is #3686 in Strongs and means authority. Would it make any difference as to which word we use or our understanding of what it means in the Lord's Prayer? Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name; or is it authority? Hallowed be the power of God's Law, the citation of chapter and verse that governs our behavior. Jews reject the authority of Jesus Christ. What difference does it make? That's the same question some White people ask upon discovery of their Identity; of being the true Israel. Mt 24:5 reads, "For many shall come in my name" ... or is it authority? It is authority. Those who play the name game and twist scriptures will be saying they are Christ or the anointed and shall deceive many. Jews don't believe in a coming messiah because they believe in the concept that the messiah is the jewish people themselves. The sacred namers will deceive the gullible into thinking that many will come in a name, and whether it's Jesus Christ or Yeshua is irrelevant, because it's a battle of authority as to whether or not it is the Christian Bible or the jewish Talmud that governs our lives.

The difference between Christian Truth and jewish lies is about as different as Shindler's list and Himmler's list. It's about as ridiculous as the black Yahwehite's leader's nonsensical name of Yaweh ben Yahweh. Leave it to a negro to embarrass his jewish handlers.

Do you want to hear something frightening? No, it's not Sammy Davis Jr. being resurrected from the grave. I investigated a couple of websites and here's what I found. The first line on the 'Jews for Jesus' website was "Shalom from the Jews for Jesus", in which the o in shalom was actually the six pointed star of Molech, a cabalistic occult symbol of evil. There were many of these stars but not one cross of calvary. They had an article titled 'Jesus was a jew' with another article explaining that His jewish name was Y'shua. Most of their links were directed to other jewish or messianic sites and their FAQs admitted to having a staff of 145 and a membership of as many as 60,000. This is a big budget major operation designed to insidiously subvert and destroy Christianity.

Even more hideous and repugnant than the 'jews for Jesus' site is Jacob Meyer's Assemblies of Yahweh website. They have a lot of jewish money to throw around also, giving away for free all kinds of literature, such as one book called "The Exclusive Source of Truth" (anybody smell a big lie?) which touts "knowing the sacred name is a pivotal basis for all understanding". I noticed that for some reason they removed the letter i from Christianity whenever it was mentioned. They practice Saturday worship, just like the jews. They offer a free monthly slick color magazine which costs big bucks to publish. They openly oppose the Cross of Calvary. For some reason, vampires and blood sucking jews have an aversion to the symbol of our Saviour's crucifixion.

They have scores of free booklets, one of which was obviously damage control and was titled "Exploding the Greek New Testament Myth". They have to resort to changing history, in order to prove the name of Jesus didn't exist. We know, however, that our Lord's name Jesus, today, is the same as it was 2000 years ago . . . Jesus. The self admitted jew Jacob Meyer has his own bible called the "Sacred Scriptures, Bethel Edition" based on the American Standard Version which is another judaized translation from the Talmudic Masoretic text as their authority. Their authority and un-sacred name interpolations are a fraud. The hype of Meyer's bible borders on chutzpah by saying they "have tried to be faithful in rendering the original texts by restoring the Sacred Name in the Old Testament and returned the name of Yashua to the New Testament, striving to make the text more understandable." Their sacred names were never there to begin with. They cloud men's minds with confusion.

In their statement of beliefs, they advocate a doctrine of non violence and that their "members refrain from military duty of any kind." Snip snip goes the castration. "The Assemblies of Yahweh teaches that salvation is freely extended to every member of the human race . . . and everybody is welcome into the family of Yahweh regardless of race." If the men of Israel do not stand fast in the host of heaven, in the militia of Jesus Christ, we shall surely fall to the weapons of devils that war against us.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. But as many received Him, to them He gave power to become the sons of God, to those believing on His name . . . AUTHORITY. I hope and pray that this message has been a blessing to you and that you now have a better understanding of this subject. A final thought from I John 3:19 gives us these words "and hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before Him." We are right, let the winds blow. [END OF SERMON]

In addition to the above sermon "The Name Game", a friend of ours, Meggie, gave us permission to include her response to a gentleman on an Internet discussion regarding the sacred name issue, and we felt the scholastics of her research merited inclusion here. The title of her article is "The Name of God?".

Tim wrote:

Exodus 9:16 "But indeed for this purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.

I think our God wants his name to be used!

There is one other point, however I am not a Hebrew scholar. This has to do with the Hebrew word hovah. You will notice that it is a part of the word Jehovah. Here is the definition from Strong's for hovah.

1943. hovah, ho-vaw'; another form for H1942; ruin:--mischief.

Here is Meggie's response:

While I agree that God wants His Name used, I must wonder if you think His Name is a questionable guess translation derived from the Tetragrammaton. If God wants us to use His Name, why would He allow mere men to subvert His intentions? I have seen proclaimers of the "sacred name" claim His name is properly spelled "Yahweh", "Yahwah", "Yahowah", Yahawah", Yavah" etc. I mean, which is it? And this is not to mention how each of those is to be enunciated. Why would God allow His name to be hidden if He wants it to be properly spelled and pronounced?

As for parts of words meaning some attribute that would not be associated with God, try these: The guess name "Yahwah" or "Yahvah" has the whole Hebrew word "ahvah" in it. That is Strong's H5753 and it means "make crooked", "commit iniquity", "pervert", "do perverse", "trouble", "do wickedly" & "do wrong."

I don't think those are very good attributes for God. And consider this. In the guess name "Yahweh" or "Yahveh" we find the Hebrew word "ahveh." That is Strong's H5773 and it means "perverse." Again, I don't think this is a very good attribute of God if it is, indeed an attribute.

The fact of the matter is the Tetragrammaton is not a Holy representation of God's name. First of all there is no "Y" in the paleo-Hebrew alphabet. It wasn't until the Masoretic advent was this letter created.

Second of all the Hebrews of the Exodus spoke Egyptian. They were in Egypt for hundreds of years. What other language would they speak? They did not speak Aramaic which is the alphabet of the Masoretic "Hebrew." There is no proof that Aramaic is pronounced like ancient paleo Hebrew, and to take "hawa" an aramaic form of "to be" and invent YHWH and then fabricate the guess name "Yahweh", is a linguistic fraud!

To that end we have this witness:

Paul Heinisch in "Theology of the Old Testament", p. 39, says "The pronunciation of the divine name as 'Yahweh' rests upon Samaritan tradition as given by Theoderet."

The reason for this falsehood is because of the canard that ancient Hebrew is a sacred and holy language is false. Thus any doctrine built upon that premise is false. To claim that God's name must be spoken in Hebrew is a false claim.

The Israelites of the Exodus spoke Egyptian and not paleo-Hebrew. It is a language made up of several other languages. The Israelites did not adopt this language until approximately 1000 B.C.

The belief that there exists one pronunciation for the name(s) of God is not based on Biblical revelation. The belief that God's names must be spoken in Paleo-Hebrew or any other Hebrew is a false belief. Moses spoke Egyptian. He was born and raised an Egyptian. Abraham spoke the Ugaritic language. And Adam spoke another language. And they all used the name of God in their language. The Israelites did not adopt the paleo-Hebrew some 600 years after coming into the promised land was not the language of Moses, Adam or Abraham.

Simply put, God spoke to each in his own language. There is no proof that God's name was to be the same sound, spelling and pronunciation throughout all ages. So how can anyone say with any authority how to "properly" pronounce God's name?

I believe the name of Jesus is the proper name of God. Jesus is the name of the God of the Bible. It is the name on which the USA was built. I find it difficult to believe that God has blessed our nation using an improper name for Him. I have heard the prevarications that the name "Jesus" is a corruption of the god Zeus or that it means "pig-god." These accusations are not based on fact. The fact of the matter is the name "Jesus" is the proper name of the God for Christians.

We can know what Jesus' name means by doing a bit of study. The name of Moses is the place to start to learn what "Jesus" means. The Egyptian word for water is "mu." Pharaoh's daughter called him "Mouses" because "uses" means "saved by water." Josephus testifies to this:

"Hereupon it was that Thermuthis (Pharoah's daughter) imposed this name Mouses upon him, from what had happened when he was put into the river; for the Egyptians call water by the name of Mo, and such as are saved out of it, by the name of Uses: so by putting these two words together, they imposed this name upon him. And he was, by the confession of all, according to God's prediction, as well for his greatness of mind as for his contempt of difficulties, the best of all the Hebrews, for Abraham was his ancestor of the seventh generation" (Josephus, Antiquities, Book II, Chapter 9, Paragraph 6).

Moses prophesied that a "Prophet" would come from Israel like unto him:

(Deu 18:18-19 KJV) "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. {19} And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him."

And Peter makes clear it's Christ, Moses was speaking of:

(Acts 3:22-23 KJV) "For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. {23} And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people."

What is the sacred name revealed to Moses at the burning bush? At the burning bush God revealed His name to Moses. From the transliteration of the Hebrew Bible of Exodus 3:13-14, we have V'yomer Eloyim el-Mosheh eh'yeh asher eh'yeh v'yomer ko tomar livneh Yisrael eh'yeh sh'lachni alechem.

Translated into English it means:

"(13). And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say unto me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? (14). And God said unto Moses, EHYEH asher EHYEH: and He said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, EHYEH hath sent me unto you"

We're told that God said to Moses to tell the Egyptians His Name was "I AM." However the Egyptian equivalent of "I am" is "nuk." If God had told Moses to tell the Egyptians His Name is "I AM" then He would have told them His name was "Nuk." The Bible does not reveal any such thing. Think about it! What was God going to do? He was going to "save" Israel. Therefore the word Ehyeh simply means the God that saves.

It's a verb! Not a proper noun! It is in the "perfect present tense." "I am" is the perfect present tense of the Name "Ehyeh." We don't replace someone's name with the tense of their name when used as a verb.

This is why Moses added the name "Yeh" or Jeh" to Oshea's name to form "Jehoshua":

(Num 13:16 KJV) "These are the names of the men which Moses sent to spy out the land. And Moses called Oshea the son of Nun Jehoshua."

The name of Jesus did not derive from the name of any pagan god. "Je" is the abbreviation of "YEH" or "JEH" the sacred name of God at the burning bush, and that "Uses or Usus" (these are the same), we have in the name of Jesus the "GOD WHO SAVES BY WATER." Since baptism is the format for entering the New Covenant, then the name Jesus is fitting and proper.

Something many seem not to understand is the name "Yah" & "Shua" means an Egyptian Diety known as the moon & sky god.

Remember it's "Jesus" that's the only name whereby one must be saved (Acts 4:12)