It's My Party and I'll Cry if I Want To

Jews

by Pastor Mark Downey

Scripture Reading: Luke 14:15-24

You might be wondering what today's Scripture reading, the parable of the great supper, has to do with the sermon title, a #1 hit song from 1963; the year the jews assassinated Camelot. The song was written by Wiener, Gold, Gottlieb and Gluck, which sounds like a jewish law firm. It was sung by Lesley Sue Goldstein, also known as Lesley Gore. Maybe somebody has made the same or similar observations as I have, but I like to think this song has gone unanalyzed until now. One can only probe the subconscious mind of the jew with the assistance of the Holy Spirit to read between the lines. I originally titled this message 'Have You Got Your Invitation Yet?' and then I heard this song in my head in a nostalgic moment for no apparent reason. Now I know why... thank you Lord, it's the perfect antithesis or maybe antichrist. The distinctions between the parable and the song are somewhat uncanny.

Through the prism of history, the notoriety of jewry can be found in their deeply rooted jealousies and propensity to rewrite history; not what really happened, but what they wished had happened; found in their greed and envy to be something they could never be i.e. God's chosen people. The Bible is the absolute Word of God set in concrete. The talmud, on the other hand, is a transient criminal code, amended like case law, at the whim and perverse fancy of rabbinical devils. For example, the feast of Purim has mutated into an orgy of drunkenness and bloodlust, which jews celebrate annually. In fact, the talmud prescribes, "A person is obligated to become inebriated on Purim" – Megillah 76. The jews get so drunk that they cannot distinguish between good and evil. Rabbi Michael Feshbach says, “On the holiday of Purim, Jews are permitted to drink to excess—until, the tradition tells us, we cannot tell the difference between the names of Haman and Mordecai.”

Matthew 22 is a parallel account of Luke 14 where the dinner party is a marriage feast, which is actually the Marriage Supper of the Lamb (Rev. 19:7-9), the complete union between Christ and His faithful Remnant of the called out ones. It is in stark contrast to the harlot church fornicating with the powers of darkness. Luke most likely had a conversation with one of the guests who attended one of many dinners Christ had with people, so he had firsthand information from an actual eyewitness who had taken the words of Jesus to heart. Matthew was most likely in attendance at one of these dinners and amplifies upon the story more fervently, which we will read shortly with commentary.

In Luke 14:11 Jesus notices some people who quickly grabbed the most highly esteemed seats at the table and said, “Those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be be exalted.” The Greek expression 'to make low' (v. 9-10) is on par with the Hebrew idea of affliction as expressed in Gen. 15:13 where God reveals to Abram that his seed would be afflicted for 400 years; likewise Exodus 1:11 where Pharaoh would put taskmasters over Israel and afflict them. To the non-Christian it's the idea of 'what doesn't kill me makes me stronger.' The Bible promotes the idea that humility brings us to a low point where we don't esteem ourselves higher than what we ought to and this certainly carries over in the way we converse with each other. We can answer someone in a variety of ways and it can either be taken the right way or the wrong way. It's what we say AND how we say it. The force of what Jesus teaches us can be seen better through the device of a parable. In itself, the principle that honors cannot be taken, but can only be received and is a little bit more than just social etiquette. When, “Abraham answered and said, Now that I have been so bold to speak to the Lord, even though I am but dust and ashes” (Gen.18:27), he was conveying humility; bold but not boastful. A boastful man would say, “I went to a party and sat right next to Jesus, yeah we're good buds.”

The natural man, in contrast to the spiritual man, is carnally minded and naturally prone to put ones self on a pedestal. Remember the cliché? “The bigger they are, they harder they fall”? Which corresponds to Prov. 16:18, “Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” The point is, we need affliction, strange as it may sound, by ourselves or others or by God, to give us an attitude of humility. This was the purpose of sending Israel to Egypt and thereafter into the Wilderness, because they needed it. It was to show them what it's like to be ruled by not-so-humble pharaohs. Nationalism without God is often based upon this kind of arrogant pride, that you can play church after we win the race war; it causes men to be partial in their judgments. In order to administer the Law of God, one must be humble and impartial. The traditions of man make men proud and implacable. It gives rise to a criminal-justice growth industry that needs crime to govern and expand. Jesus opposed the jewish traditions of the elders, as we should oppose the 'learned elders of Zion' i.e. Zionism today.

The Bible is the greatest love story that has been told in so many different ways, that it's hard to see the forest from the trees. In other words, to see the big picture from all of the pieces of the puzzle. II Peter 1:20 says, “Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.” Every word that proceeds from the mouth of God written by the hand of man was inspired by the Spirit of God. Sometimes we don't always comprehend the details, but given time and patience, study and prayer, we receive the text in it's intended meaning. Therefore we stand in the Light of the world and it shines in our heart. If we fall away from that Light, we're going dark. There is only one 'tree of life' and that is from He who promises eternal life.

The chorus, repeated 6 times (the number of man) is a contorted jewish love story: “It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to, you would cry too, if it happened to you.” If what happened to you? The aforementioned phrase became part of American pop culture used to describe being utterly humiliated and miserable during an event that was supposed to be a happy occasion. In 1963 everybody was singing it without the slightest inkling of a deeper meaning like “I drove my Chevy to levy but the levy was dry.” 'It's My Party' was one of the most vivid evocations of adolescent heartbreak. William Congreve, the 17th century English poet, phrased it thusly: “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” It's something that reaches the pinnacle of anger for suffering rejection. There's a bunch of reality shows on TV called 'The Housewives of New York' or New Jersey or Orange County or Beverly Hills and they're all hyper-emotions on steroids. Why put so much trash on the menu for public consumption? It's for the same reason 'It's My Party' became a smash hit. The media is a kingdom and jews run it. What should be happy is turned into sad. And we are programmed to be sad, even excruciatingly depressed. The apostate church does nothing to remedy the situation. The jew is glorified. However, what the Edomite jew does not tell the sheep feeding at their trough, is that their ancestor (Esau) sold, and therefore rejected, his birthright to his brother Jacob (later named Israel and patriarch of the 12 tribes) and thereafter, he and his genetic descendants snapped; their psyche became warped, because Esau race mixed with the Canaanites. Keep in mind, that in ancient times up to recent history, the mongrel mixed breed was not allowed into the White congregation, because Whites keep the Law of God. Maybe they were sad that they could never be like the White man, the envy of race. Modern jews, descendants of Esau-Edom, are not Jacob-Israel, “And I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judeans, and are not, but are the synagogue of satan” Rev. 2:9. They rewrote the Bible, through their media monopolies, renaming Judeans as “Jews” and then started calling themselves jews. They were never from the tribe of Judah, let alone comprising all 12 tribes of Israel. It's one of the greatest swindles of all time. It not only proved their love of mammon, it switched good for evil and evil for good. “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator”? Romans 1:25.

It should be noted that humility is not humiliation nor vice versa. Both behaviors respectively produce good and evil energy. Humility is a humble spirit that is true to self, choosing the Cross before self, able to judge the image in the mirror convicting thyself of transgressions, and then repenting and cleaning house, willing to make the necessary adjustments in attitude. The world is your oyster; within sits a pearl of great price... peace of mind, having the right relationship with God. This ability to be corrected cannot be realized by anyone outside of Israel, God's true chosen people. They have an entirely different approach to life. Humiliation, on the other end of the world, is bankrupt of spiritual reconciliation, so full of self that introspection becomes a barrier to “all that is in the world” (I John 2:16); it crushes them in defeat, thinking anger is strength, resentments are justified, blame and shame are normal; thinking life is too painful to bear; its standard of misery seeks company; the world is its hostage for a crooked and perverse generation. Philippians 2:14-16 separates the godly from the ungodly this way, “That you would be perfect in kind and with unmixed blood, blameless children of God in the midst of a race perverse and corrupted, among whom you shine as lights in the world; upholding the Word of Life; that I may rejoice in the Day of Christ.” Compare that with the Masoretic mistranslations that voids the racial context, as in the KJV.

There's only 3 stanza's for the lyrics to tell the story from the singer in the first person and it goes like this:

Nobody knows where my Johnny has gone
Judy left the same time
Why was he holding her hand
When he's supposed to be mine?
Play all my records, keep dancing all night
But leave me alone for a while
'Til Johnny's dancing with me
I've got no reason to smile
Oh, Judy and Johnny just walked through that door
Like a queen with her King
Oh what a birthday surprise
Judy's wearin' his ring

The sad implication in this song is that the singer has been totally humiliated and devastated at her own birthday party by someone she thought loved her. Imagine this birthday party as a false analogy of Israel's Messiah coming for His bride. Is it a coincidence that the two character's names begin with the letter 'J'? Let's say Johnny is Jehovah (a hybrid form of Latin and Mazorete pseudo-Hebrew) and Judy is judaism (sometimes pronounced Judyism). If the singer of this song wasn't a whining jewess wallowing in self pity, the typical jewish persecution complex of a soap opera drama queen, then perhaps she could have been Johnny's queen. She might as well have been singing 'It's my holocaust, and I'll snivel if I want to.' And maybe, just maybe, all of the crocodile tears was because it was a grand hoax... a holy hoax. God doesn't really love the songstress or the jews. But wait, there's more: in the religion that worships people named Judy, it clearly states in their talmud, “The Messiah is without metaphor the jewish people” - Kethuboth 111a. What does that mean? It means that Johnny and Judy and the singer are all jews and that by their own self-deification, they practice a religion of humiliation, playing king of the hill, making every jew expendable unto themselves; if jews were the only people on earth, they would eventually self-destruct; the last jew in the world would have all the marbles, but for what?

The party is all about ego i.e. “it's my party.” And the singer has the attitude that she alone has the power to decide what is right or wrong: she'll cry IF she wants to. Not only that, but she is a pied piper bringing the listener into the song and says, “You would cry too if it happened to you.” And guess what? It has happened to us. Christianity has been judaized with the situational ethics of secular humanism; it's been Hinduized with the tolerance of dharma; it's been paganized with the party animal's annual holy days. We have been processed by going after strange gods; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter, living among the zombies who are spiritually dead, who repay evil with humiliation.

Is this the instruction? 'If My people, who are called by My name, shall humiliate themselves, and prey, and not see anything in the mirror, and have their own private parties, and cry and cry and cry as a way of life'? Of course not; that's more of a blueprint from the Protocols to snare the White man, when he is drawn away of his own lust and enticed. What a simple plan; to get us to sin because the wages of sin is death. It's almost incredible how they rub our nose in the next jew war against some comic book army that just so happened to materialize overnight in the jewish media. Wars are the jew's harvest. There is no honor or patriotism in today's American military. I have said for years that 'we support our troops to mutiny.' But, for fear of the jews, they fight with blind faith and die in boots made in China.

Ever hear of 'the song of the Lamb' found in Rev. 15:3? It's not any different really than the 'song of Moses' found in Deut. 32. Both celebrate their ordeals and afflictions and being delivered from their enemies; a song of triumph and gratitude without any reference to their suffering. The focus is on the great work of God upon His people Israel. The song is exclusively for one race of people. “Now therefore write this song... and teach it to the children of Israel... that this song may be a witness for Me against the children of Israel. For when I shall have brought them into the land which I sware unto their fathers, that floweth with milk and honey; and they shall have eaten and filled themselves, and waxen fat; then will they turn to other gods, and serve them, and provoke Me, and break My covenant.” Deut. 31:19-20. The song establishes who is God, it is He who is identified as the Rock (Deut. 32:4 and Mt. 16:18) and the Lord's portion is His people, Jacob is the lot of His inheritance (Deut. 32:9). It's the racial message of our Kinsman Redeemer, Jesus Christ. It's a prophecy of our party with the Lord where all tears will be wiped away. “He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord God will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of His people shall He take away from off all the earth: for the Lord hath spoken it” Isaiah 25:8. You don't think that's something to celebrate? How's that hymn go? “I sing because I'm happy, I sing because I'm free, His eye is on the sparrow and I know He watches me.” The Groom of Israel swears “Your life should be free from the love of money. Be satisfied with what you have, for He Himself has said, I will never leave you or forsake you” (Heb. 13:5, Deut. 31:6).

Is Leslie Goldstein happy and free, singing 'It's My Party'? Well, don't you know that she's gay? There's nothing happy about the sad fate of Sodom and Gomorrah or the immoral lifestyle of gender perversion. The singer actually likes Judy not Johnny and her tears are the frustration of not being able to consummate her relationship with Judy. In 1963 lesbianism was viewed as a deviant abnormality and so the song is infused with subconscious layers of meaning. This is the jewish alchemy of occult change agents, planting time-released assaults on White Christian culture. Judy is trying to make the singer jealous by leaving with Johnny and has no intention of being with him. The singer had originally planned to use the party as a coming out of the closet event for her and Judy, but Judy got scared and left with Johnny, and thereby deflecting attention away from the real issue. But wait! There's more. There was a sequel song called 'Judy's Turn to Cry.' The singer kisses another boy at another party in order to make Johnny jealous and to take revenge on Judy; Johnny hits the other boy and returns to the singer. And they lived happily ever after in the Pax Judaica. It is void of any Christian values. For some reason, this genre of music (by that I mean antichrist messaging) became normalized by the gradual rise in temperature to boil the frog in the saucepan. All the behavioral ingredients to undermine the children of true Israel. Romans 1:28-32 is especially relevant to this discussion: “Since they thought it foolish to acknowledge God, he abandoned them to their foolish thinking and let them do things that should never be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.” Does any of it glorify our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ? Whatever the jew touches, whatever the jewish lackies mimic, it is poison to the White race.

If you got your special invitation from Christ to attend the Party of all parties, would you vacillate on whether to go or not? Do you procrastinate right now as to whether or not you've committed yourself to getting ready for the party? If you are a racially pure White person, you will get a call (a divine calling) sometime in your life to face your Redeemer, to accept or reject the day of your salvation, to receive your deliverance from the hand of all who hate our race. This is the real meaning of the banquet, our humble communion with the Creator. Jesus opens the doors of His Kingdom to His people; He explained to them, “I tell you the truth, I am the door of the sheep. All that ever came before Me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them. I am the door: by Me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, they will come and go freely and will find good pastures. The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they [Israel] may have life, and have it to the full” John 10:7-10. The greatest identity theft in the history of the world is jews stealing the namesake of Israel and the cost has been deadly for us. He is not the door of the goats. If you'd rather go to the goat party and cry over Babylon, then at least understand the consequences. “For many are called [invited], but few are chosen” Mt. 22:14. What are we chosen for? We weren't chosen to just sit on the sidelines and watch Christ do it all. Judy and the singer have glorified themselves... “and lived deliciously, so give her so much torment and sorrow, because she said in her heart, I sit a queen” (Rev. 18:7). “Oh, Judy and Johnny just walked through that door, Like a queen with her King” ya think? “For this reason her plagues will come in one day; death and grief and famine. She will be burned up with fire, because the Lord God who judges her is mighty” (v.8). Now, they can cry for her and there won't be any ands, ifs or buts about it... “The kings of the earth who have committed sexual immorality and lived luxuriously with her will weep and mourn over her when they see the smoke of her burning” (v.9).

Let's look at the parallel narrative in Matthew 22. The one who issues the invitation is a king, and the occasion is a marriage feast. He has many emissaries sent out in his behalf. Those on the 'A List' are not content to just decline the invitation, they assassinate the king's messengers. “But the king was enraged, and he sent his armies and destroyed those murderers and set their city on fire” Mt. 22:7. It is not difficult to interpret this as alluding to those who crucified Jesus and were rewarded with the Roman army decimating Jerusalem in 70AD. This party of which honor reigns above all else was more than mere social etiquette; it was Christ striking at the very heart of the Pharisees i.e. their hypocrisy coupled with piety. Pharisaism, which became judaism, was a religion of merit, of salvation by works, especially flamboyant gratuities; it was a righteousness of their own making... they would be in control if their was to be any party. Jesus countered this presumptuous sanctimony by insisting that members of His Kingdom should act toward others as God had acted toward them. God gives to those who cannot repay Him. His kindness goes out to those who can offer Him nothing in return, but love. To act this way, to act like a White man as God intended, towards one's fellow Adamic man, is to enter into the spirit and purpose of God, and is to be richly blessed at the final Judgment. “Then you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you, for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous" Luke 14:14. Needless to say, if one should do kind deeds just in order to be repaid at the resurrection, the reward would not be his. It is those who act without thought of reward to whom the reward is given.

The king sends his servants out to invite all whom they meet. “Then he said to his servants, The wedding feast is ready, but those invited were not worthy. So go to the street corners and invite to the banquet anyone you find. So the servants went out into the streets and gathered all the people they could find, the bad as well as the good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests. But when the king came in to meet the guests, he noticed a man who wasn't wearing the proper clothes for a wedding. He asked, 'How did you get in here without wedding clothes, friend?' The man was speechless. Then the king told the attendants, Tie him up hand and foot, and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For many are called ones, but few chosen ones” Mt. 22:8-14. The context of course is not a universal invitation to heathen and aborigines, but to Israelites, because they're the only ones who are called of God. The King was saying to those who wanted their own party on their terms, separate from the King's party, “If you want something to cry about, I'll give you something to cry about.” Remember hearing that from wise parents? “Outer darkness” is far away from the shining light of glory being enjoyed by the guests at the banquet; and cast out into the doom and gloom that they already gravitated to; nothing but darkness, pain, grief, tears, and despair, for those who are not at the wedding feast. Is this just about being the fashion police? Hardly. The garment is symbolic of God clothing us with His righteousness and His salvation. “He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life... These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb... Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honor to Him; for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and His wife has made herself ready. And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white; for the fine linen is the righteousness of the saints” Rev. 3:5, 7:14, 19:7-8.

Lesley Goldstein hosted a PBS newsmagazine called 'In the Life', which covered the homosexual lifestyle for 20 years. It could never have been titled 'In the Faith' even if some damn sodomites published a thing called The Queen James Bible. Even the poor, and crippled, and blind and lame, having the faith of a mustard seed, had more righteousness than the rich, and the famous, and the hypocrites and perverts could ever hope to have. Jesus knew that the likelihood of repentance from official judaism was nil; their invitation was dead on arrival. No amount of revival could resuscitate a congenital reprobate or those they make twice the child of hell. The case against the hypocrites is represented by the guests that didn't have a wedding garment. It concerns all to prepare for the scrutiny; and those, and those only, who put on the Lord Jesus, who have a Christian temperament, to live in the faith of Jesus Christ. No man has the wedding garment by nature; it can only be received by accepting your invitation and preparing your life in accord with the Word of God. Those who walk unworthy under the banner of Christ, forfeit all the happiness they presumptuously claim. You just can't name it and claim it. The day is coming when all race traitors will be called to account for their intrusions, adulterations and usurpations of divine authority. Let us examine whether our life is in the faith or our faith is in the life. “Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it ” Luke 17:33.

Matthew went further than Luke in accusing those who rejected the invite and pointed to those who had contempt for even being asked. It's no different today with jews insulted at the thought of being proselytized. It wasn't just dreaming up an excuse of not attending i.e. I gotta go look at some real estate I just bought, and another who thought his farm animals were more important and yet another thinking his own marriage more important than the Marriage Supper of the Lamb (Luke 14:20)! It was contempt. Were people more interested in land inheritance than gaining the character of an overcomer? And who is obsessive-compulsive about a certain land mass in the so called holy lands today? The Pharisees were jealous and offended by the popularity of Jesus. After their final rejection of Him in the Crucifixion, God would reject them. They gladly imposed what they thought was an unenforceable curse upon themselves; "His blood is on us and on our children!" Mt. 27:25. They said that because the blood of Christ was not for the purpose of cleansing them from their wickedness, to the contrary, it was for the justification to shed more blood upon His followers to this day. Matthew well understood their treachery and how “they made light” (Mt. 22:5) of the seriousness of God's offer of grace. Matthew identified them and us: “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money” Mt. 6:24. The reason why sinners don't come to Christ and salvation by Him, is not because they can't, but because they won't. Making light of our Kinsman Redeemer is the damning sin of the world. James, in writing about the jewish communities, called them an “adulterous people,” because of their love for this evil world (James 4:4). Jews do not control the world, God does. He simply gives them the illusion that they have power. There is a jewish conspiracy to destroy everything Christian and it's only successful because Churchianity has conformed to an antichrist agenda. But, we pray, the “antisemitic” tag is wearing very thin these days as jews have no traceable seedline to Shem; they are a mongrel/mixed multitude. And leading the propaganda of a 'jew on a stick' is itself a jewish invention. Everything about the jew's religion is anathema to the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. They are not invited, they don't want to be invited and more importantly they have their own party without Christ, in which you are invited to love the host... the international jew.

On a positive note, White Christians are transformed by the renewing of our minds, when we come out of Mystery Babylon. When we discover that the White race can trace our seedline all the way back to Adam; we are the progeny of Jacob-Israel; that we don't have to partake of the antichrist substitutes; that we receive not of her plagues. Their party is not our party. We have every reason to smile. There is never the slightest hint that Esau-Edom will convert to Christ at the very last minute; that is not only absurd, it contradicts Scripture; for “The house of Jacob shall be as a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it ” Obadiah 1:18. Now that's what I call a house warming party!!!

I hope this message brought a smile to your face. We need not fear the jews. I'm ready to party, but not one written by Weiner, Gold, Gottleib and Gluck. I'm going to stick with Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.